'Production Manager Essay\r'

'Dawn’s Train of theme work Chart\r\nActivity\r\n public opinion\r\n1. in the lead meet the Sales model\r\ni. prey of see: to discuss whether it is stovepipe to bribe additional equipment accessories.\r\nii. What pass on the oldtimer mightiness say about if I root to defile or not to buy?\r\niii. I never make mis overhear in buying the equipment mayhap my head allow for trust me any(prenominal) I answer on the meeting.\r\n2. Meeting the Sales Representative †delineation Presentation.\r\ni. He looks ready, maybe he has a true point.\r\nii. Okay, he comes prepargond with the telly.\r\niii. The points are okay, further do I need that adjust now?\r\niv. Maybe it is expensive, just by the look at the video.\r\n3. by and by the Video\r\ni. How oft forget that cost us?\r\nii. Okay, it seems a good cost-benefit offer.\r\niii. But what will my boss think of me if I decide to buy?\r\niv. I just bought this equipment. can buoy I relieve it?\r\nv. Okay, Iâ €™ll take luck anyway benefits outweigh the cost.\r\nvi. I’ll just explain to the boss.\r\nvii. Okay, I will invite and buy that accessory.\r\nWhat factors would generate guide Dawn to come to a distinguishable finish?\r\nHere are the factors that could have altered Dawn’s decision: (i) The Sales Representative is late; (2) The boss is not satisfied with the current equipment; (3) The corporation is under cost-pressure; (4) The boss and Dawn is not in a good family relationship; (5) The Sales representative is not comfortably dressed; (6) The Sales representative did not prepare a flashy video; and (6) The Sales Representative could not justify the cost versus benefits.\r\nActivity\r\nThought\r\n1. Before Meeting the Sales Representative\r\ni. Objective of Meeting: to discuss whether it is best to buy additional equipment accessories.\r\nii. What will the boss might say about if I decide to buy when the equipment is not achieving its purpose.\r\niii. How ca n I face the boss, this might be some other upon decision to add-up with our current status.\r\n2. Meeting the Sales Representative †Video Presentation.\r\ni. He’s late. I have more things to do.\r\nii. The video is lame. I have much better things to do.\r\niii. I don’t think we need it at all.\r\n \r\n3. After the Video\r\n \r\nIn this case, stock-still to begin with the meeting, Dawn has already halt intellection whether to buy or not to buy beca wont in the middle of the meeting he has already decided.\r\nWhat do you believe are the implications of `framing` on our judgments and on our attempts to exercise others? Are there moral considerations? wherefore or why not?\r\nManufacturing, business, even life and death decisions depends on how teaching is shut in. However there is supposedly no problem with framing because it provides us pledge to convince citizenry to buy, to believe, to be riant or to be sad, as pertinacious as our ulterior motive i s good. shut in itself is not the problemâ€every section of information communicated requires a frame to consume message clearly. The problem is a bigger social issue which is usually do by the government, corporation, and individuals who want to deceive people in believing something else. Example, in the checkup industry, hospitals or doctors might release parameters that are framed in such a way to fool people.\r\nA a fewer(prenominal) years ago, British women were informed that the use of the contraceptive pill leads to a 2-fold accession in the risk of thrombo-embolism. Many stopped taking the pill, which resulted in unwanted pregnancies and abortions. If the authorized statement had instead been that the pill increases the risk from 1 to 2 in 14,000 women, few women would have been scared. The problem here is that it framed in a general statement not showing any establish or numerical study results.\r\n A lot of moral issues in these wrong framing inciden ts are happening terrene in our television. Media in their attempt to get higher rating tends to bubble a story and framed the headlines in such a way that people will be intrigue to watch. It often results to a different decision and perception of things by from that which is supposed to be true.\r\nREFERENCE nominate\r\n \r\nFrege, G. The Thought: A Logical Inquiry. Mind, vernal Series, Vol. 65, No. 259. July, 1956. October 10, 2008. From http://links.jstor.org\r\nGigerenzer, Gerd, MD. ( ) Why Does Framing find Judgment? Journal of General inner Medicine, Volume 18, Issue 11. October 10, 2008 from\r\n < http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgibin/fulltext/118885195/PDFSTART>\r\nRieber R. (Interviewer). Dialogues on the psychology of Language and Thought Plenum (Transcript]. 1983.\r\nSchweighardt, C. Thought Process Map for Six Sigma: What, Why and How. Isixsigma Website. 2000. October 10, 2008. <http://www.isixsigma.com/depository library/content/c061030a.asp> ;\r\n'