Julius Caesar

Hobbes view towards comm acers was reasonably correct. His theory states that masses should live downstairs a strict government, where they sacrifice their own rights to ensure order. During the throw up of Julius Caesar, he ruled in a way to complexify out the passel just enough so they dont complain. However, Cassius, Brutus, and the separate conspirators mat up that the macrocosm was beginning to revere Julius Caesar to a fault much. The potential threats that Brutus approximation Caesar was posing was that his ego was getting in the way of his signified and he also did not the likes of how Caesar would soon be crowned and have absolute motive over everyone.         doubting Thomas Hobbes states, The condition of man is a condition of war of everyone against everyone. Hobbes believed that people should have to give up their rights so that the government could move on order. In essence, he believed that all people are evil. His ideas were so mewhat adopted by the Roman government during the reign of Julius Caesar. However, Brutus believed in this more. He believed that the cosmopolitan public was stupid and gullible. His account for this is obvious when the people were on Pompeys attitude, but as soon as they saw Julius Caesar was vent to win, they switched sides. This also proves one of Hobbes ideas about family in which he believes that people are all esurient and selfish. They will pick whichever side that best benefits them, as transparent in the opening survey of Act one. Marcus Brutus was the only one who actually drink downed Julius Caesar for the comfortably of Rome. The others were just envious of the fact that the public loved Caesar with such passion.         Brutus did not have the right to kill Caesar. The right affair for Brutus to do, since he was a loyal friend... If you trust to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPap! er.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper